Download Maps and Coins vs History (History: Fiction or Science? Book 17), by Anatoly Fomenko, Gleb Nosovskiy
It is really simple to check out guide Maps And Coins Vs History (History: Fiction Or Science? Book 17), By Anatoly Fomenko, Gleb Nosovskiy in soft file in your device or computer system. Again, why should be so hard to get guide Maps And Coins Vs History (History: Fiction Or Science? Book 17), By Anatoly Fomenko, Gleb Nosovskiy if you can choose the less complicated one? This website will relieve you to pick as well as pick the best cumulative books from the most desired vendor to the launched book just recently. It will always upgrade the collections time to time. So, connect to internet as well as visit this site always to obtain the new book each day. Currently, this Maps And Coins Vs History (History: Fiction Or Science? Book 17), By Anatoly Fomenko, Gleb Nosovskiy is your own.
Maps and Coins vs History (History: Fiction or Science? Book 17), by Anatoly Fomenko, Gleb Nosovskiy
Download Maps and Coins vs History (History: Fiction or Science? Book 17), by Anatoly Fomenko, Gleb Nosovskiy
How if there is a website that allows you to look for referred publication Maps And Coins Vs History (History: Fiction Or Science? Book 17), By Anatoly Fomenko, Gleb Nosovskiy from all over the world author? Immediately, the site will certainly be extraordinary finished. So many book collections can be discovered. All will certainly be so simple without complicated thing to move from website to site to obtain the book Maps And Coins Vs History (History: Fiction Or Science? Book 17), By Anatoly Fomenko, Gleb Nosovskiy really wanted. This is the site that will give you those requirements. By following this website you can get lots varieties of publication Maps And Coins Vs History (History: Fiction Or Science? Book 17), By Anatoly Fomenko, Gleb Nosovskiy compilations from variations kinds of writer as well as publisher prominent in this world. Guide such as Maps And Coins Vs History (History: Fiction Or Science? Book 17), By Anatoly Fomenko, Gleb Nosovskiy as well as others can be obtained by clicking nice on web link download.
By reviewing Maps And Coins Vs History (History: Fiction Or Science? Book 17), By Anatoly Fomenko, Gleb Nosovskiy, you can recognize the understanding and things even more, not only regarding exactly what you get from individuals to individuals. Book Maps And Coins Vs History (History: Fiction Or Science? Book 17), By Anatoly Fomenko, Gleb Nosovskiy will be much more relied on. As this Maps And Coins Vs History (History: Fiction Or Science? Book 17), By Anatoly Fomenko, Gleb Nosovskiy, it will really provide you the smart idea to be successful. It is not just for you to be success in certain life; you can be successful in everything. The success can be begun by understanding the fundamental knowledge and also do activities.
From the combo of expertise and activities, someone could improve their ability as well as ability. It will lead them to live and also work much better. This is why, the pupils, employees, or perhaps employers must have reading routine for books. Any publication Maps And Coins Vs History (History: Fiction Or Science? Book 17), By Anatoly Fomenko, Gleb Nosovskiy will offer certain understanding to take all advantages. This is what this Maps And Coins Vs History (History: Fiction Or Science? Book 17), By Anatoly Fomenko, Gleb Nosovskiy tells you. It will add more understanding of you to life and also function much better. Maps And Coins Vs History (History: Fiction Or Science? Book 17), By Anatoly Fomenko, Gleb Nosovskiy, Try it and also verify it.
Based upon some encounters of many people, it is in reality that reading this Maps And Coins Vs History (History: Fiction Or Science? Book 17), By Anatoly Fomenko, Gleb Nosovskiy could help them making far better option as well as give even more encounter. If you want to be among them, let's acquisition this publication Maps And Coins Vs History (History: Fiction Or Science? Book 17), By Anatoly Fomenko, Gleb Nosovskiy by downloading guide on link download in this site. You can obtain the soft file of this book Maps And Coins Vs History (History: Fiction Or Science? Book 17), By Anatoly Fomenko, Gleb Nosovskiy to download and install as well as put aside in your readily available digital gadgets. Exactly what are you awaiting? Let get this book Maps And Coins Vs History (History: Fiction Or Science? Book 17), By Anatoly Fomenko, Gleb Nosovskiy on-line and also read them in any time and also any sort of location you will review. It will certainly not encumber you to bring heavy book Maps And Coins Vs History (History: Fiction Or Science? Book 17), By Anatoly Fomenko, Gleb Nosovskiy inside of your bag.
US research of earth-moon mechanics by NASA astrophysist Robert Newton leads mathematicians of Moscow State University to a breakthrough in the chronology of civilization. 'Maps and Coins vs. History', from the e-series History: Fiction or Science? shows You that scores of maps and hoards of coins contradict consensual world history. 'Maps and Coins vs. History' questions the numismatics per se. Dr Fomenko et al take a close look at maps of XIV-XVIII that confirm the theory of New Chronology and point to existance of Empire present nearly over all of Eurasia. They analyse the spread all over Europe of hoards of coins, they note numerous peculiarites like coins of Kings, Princes minted with arab, turkic inscriptions. The book contains data, illustrations, charts and formulae containing irrefutable evidence of mathematical, statistical and astronomical nature. Feel free to use them in your eventual discussions with the avid devotees of classical chronology. In fact, before reading this book, you have most probably been one of such devotees. After reading books of 'History: Fiction or Science?' series you will develop a more critical attitude to the dominating historical discourse or even become its antagonist.You will be confronted with natural disbelief when you share what you’ve learned with others. Now you are very well armed in face of inevitable scepticism. This book contains enough solid evidence to
silence any historian by the sheer power of facts and argumentation. History: Fiction or Science? is the most explosive tractate on history ever written – however, every theory it contains, no matter how unorthodox, is backed by solid scientific data. The dominating historical discourse in its current state was essentially crafted in the XVI century from a rather contradictory jumble of sources such as innumerable copies of ancient Latin and Greek manuscripts whose originals had vanished in the Dark Ages and the allegedly irrefutable proof offered by late mediaeval astronomers, resting upon the power of ecclesial authorities. Nearly all of its components are blatantly untrue! For some of us, it shall possibly be quite disturbing to see the magnificent edifice of classical history to turn into an ominous simulacrum brooding over the snake pit of mediaeval politics. Twice so, in fact: the first seeing the legendary millenarian dust on the ancient marble turn into a mere layer of dirt – one that meticulous unprejudiced research can eventually remove.The second, and greater, attack of unease comes with the awareness of just how any areas of human knowledge still trust the elephants, turtles and whales of the consensual chronology
to support them. Nothing can remedy that except for an individual chronological revolution happening in the minds of a large enough number of people.
- Sales Rank: #588058 in eBooks
- Published on: 2015-08-20
- Released on: 2015-08-20
- Format: Kindle eBook
Most helpful customer reviews
4 of 5 people found the following review helpful.
Never Let Facts Get in the Way of a Good Conclusion
By Arch Stanton
For those who don't know what these books are (ie. most people who aren't Russian) you're looking at the dry scholarly tomes of a mathematician who decided he didn't care for the minor role of Russia in ancient and early medieval history and decided that this meant all history must be all wrong. Now I'm not dissing the Russians here. These ideas were rightly dismissed by Russian experts decades ago and, except for the occasional eccentric mathematician and celebrity, they receive little attention now. That's why he's searching for a new audience: his books have sold just about as much as they ever will in Russia. Time to release them in English. Because if there's one thing an English audience loves reading it's Russian propaganda.
These books are a statistician's attempt to combat established history using page after endless page of charts and diagrams in the hope that people won't actually check through all these figures. At twenty-two volumes in length it's a fairly safe bet, even though these books are extremely short (about 80 pages by my count, though he claims 287). But what's really amazing is how little digging it actually takes to find the repeated and obvious errors in his work. The man is so certain that he must be right that he sees no problem with forcibly altering the facts to fit his "theory" or accepting huge margins of error when seeking a parallelism.
You don't even have to wait for the book to begin for the errors to creep in. The title alone presents a false dichotomy. Fiction or Science? As if those are the only two options. And I have no doubt that Fomenko does indeed see it that way given his haughty dismissal of anything even loosely connected to the Arts. History is too close to the Arts and must be purged of anything that isn't a string of exact, quantifiable numbers. All similar number strings must be combined into the same string, and any "facts" or "historical personages" attached to those numbers must be purged as well. Nice, clean math. But it's more disturbing than just that. These books are a vast horde of Russian nationalic propaganda. Apart from ridiculing any non-Scientists (AKA those unqualified to form proper conclusions) the main goal of these books is to establish that Russia ruled all the world from North America through Europe into China and the Middle East, and they did so for most of recorded history. So his two assumptions about the world are:
1. All Non-Scientists are either liars or idiots.
2. Everything in the world originated in Russia.
One of these two assumptions is underlying every single one of his conclusions. He treats his random and unsupported speculations with just as much respect as ones that have been established through years of research backed by hard evidence. All Arts and Humanities subjects are regarded as worthless as sources of information and aren't even worth mentioning unless to state (not argue or prove) that they are wrong.
And now the history of the world as outlined in this book: History begins when Andronicos Comnenos dies and becomes Jesus. History records him as an unsuccessful Greek emperor with no real successes who was beaten to death by the mob and not a poor prophet from Nazareth who was crucified but hey, what do they know. It's not like the crucifixion was an important part of the story or anything. Immediately all of Europe decides that they're Christian and march against the Muslims. It may sound confusing why they'd blame the Muslims for what was an internal coup but they were probably just confused because Mohammed wasn't born yet. At some point they changed their minds and decided to skip the first three crusades and jump straight onto the Fourth (except that they didn't. It was actually the same as the First. Obviously. Please try and keep up). They then sacked Constantinople which was also Rome which was Troy which was Jerusalem. At some point they get confused and occupied the Holy Land as well and then forget all about Constantinople and let it fall back to the Greeks since Jerusalem was now Constantinople which was Troy which was Rome. People back then had very short memories often forgetting why they did something before they even did it. This is probably due to their lack of statisticians. During the First Crusade the Greeks decide to avenge the kidnapping of their queen by... also sacking Constantinople. After sacking their own city they quietly vanish for a few years, probably in embarrassment. Some time later Erasmus wrote the New Testament confusing generations of scholars who wondered what they had been copying out for all that time. Having now written a New Testament it was decided that they needed an Old one. I'm sure the reasons for the reversed order are as obvious to everyone else as they are to Fomenko. Some time in the 15th Century David rose up, except that he was Turkish and ruled in Constantinople. Despite the many wars with the Turks Europe had never warred with the Turks and accepted all of these events as holy writ. After all, the Turks were really Russian in funny hats and the Russians ruled the world. The Byzantines were secretly ruling in England. After the death of Solomon (Suleimon) the Jews split off from Christianity because they were tired of not being persecuted because of something they didn't do and decided that being hunted by the Inquisition was more fun. In the confusion the Catholics and Orthodox Christians split apart as well because everyone else was doing it and it seemed a good idea at the time. They were to regret this later when the Catholics sacked their city but that had already happened so it was fine.
It turns out that Russia has dominated the world since the earliest recorded history (what a shock!). The Mongols were not from Mongolia because the people there are nothing but worthless servants of the Russian Empire (it's ok. Fomenko assures us that the Mongols never knew of Genghis Khan until some pesky monks told them that they used to rule the world). Russia was actually the major Empire that the Romans were based off of and has existed since the dawn of civilization. Silly Georgians thinking they are anything but the personal property of Russia! Ha ha. They also controlled America, Europe and North Africa by 1300 so I guess that we should all submit to the Russian yoke as is our hereditary duty. Occasionally a czar would allow the governors of Europe (kings hah!) to wage war on each other if they pleased him. Presumably the English sucked up to him better than France which is why they did so well in the Hundred Years War but then lost his favor again which resulted in the French winning. Joan of Arc was probably the czar's sister or something. The czar could summon anyone to his court and they had to obey which is why Moscow is renowned the world over as being filled with better artwork and architecture than such dives as Paris and Rome (which isn't the REAL Rome after all). After Russia fell in the 1600s (through internal troubles. No one could EVER conquer Russians) the rest of the world immediately conspired to hide that they ever existed lest they should try to rule over them again. Thus they erased this empire from the history books and replaced it with such lies as Rome and the Holy Roman Empire (couldn't they even pick a new name? Obvious!). Thus the treacherous Romanovs rose to power (did I mention that he first published this under the Soviets?) and they too decided to forget there had ever been a Russian Empire of such a scale. Many "Roman" documents are simply Russian ones with a few name changes. Latin is merely a corrupted form of church Slavonic, despite bearing no similarity to that language. The Russians probably invented it to confuse future generations of schoolkids. They had after all had it engraved all over the southern part of their empire on specific styles of buildings which they immediately buried and built medieval cities on top of to confuse archaeologists. It never showed up in Russia itself. Perhaps they punished the provinces by making them write everything in Latin. Oh those cruel Russians. After the late 18th Century things begin to return to what is normally called history.
As you can see it is far less confusing than the 'conventional' timeline. You might think I'm making this up but that is what you get when you put all his history together. Minus the sarcasm perhaps.
Here Fomenko has to face the enormous problem that other forms of evidence pose to his "theories". He enjoys focusing on maps but coins are the real killer. Most of his supposedly nonexistent kings printed coinage in their own name which is both unique and localized to the region where they ruled. Fomenko mostly deals with this by, you guessed it, ignoring it. Even in the book that is supposed to be dedicated entirely to it. What he does instead is focus entirely on Russian coinage while ignoring other nation's coins and the fact that they are remarkably concentrated in the very areas that he claims constantly changed names. To the extent that he does confront this issue he focuses on side problems, like the fact that coin portraiture is generally similar or that they didn't generally provide dates until fairly recently. And he spends a surprising amount of time justifying his chronology's existence and making it look like the history of the subject isn't one of utter failure but in fact a growing consensus. And you can join in! Only $6.95 a shot! What a bargain!
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful.
Counterfeit world history
By B.Guggenheim
When the clergy took over the control of Chronology in XVIcy it was a part of mathematics. Saint Augustine warned: 'be wary of mathematicians, particularly when they speak the truth !' Prescient. Today the mathematicians took it back and checked it. The scientific approach to the World History with ways and means of exact sciences shows: all real events that took place over 1200 years ago as well as people who allegedly acted in them are simply unknown to us and will stay so forever. Ancient Egypt, Europe, Rome, China, India, etc..etc histories are figmental prior to that date. Home sapiens could neither read nor write at that time. That was prehistory. Everything told to us about pre-1200 years ago events is fiction. Human 'civilization' had yet to be worked out. Civilization started its relentness progress in 800 A.D., developed its major features like writing, communications, religions and & arts, centralized civil and military management approx. by 1000 A.D. That was 'ancient' history. Nearly nothing is about this period known for sure. 'Antiquity ' is label applied to figmental events and people that allegedly lived prior to 800 A.D, but actually happened in 1000 A.D.– 1500 A.D. All written, artistic, even architectural artifacts presented as being older than 1200 years are found upon scrutiny either as machinations and falsifications performed by the white and black clergy, artists, architects, sculptors during 1400 A.D. - 2000 A.D. or misinterpretations and misdating of events taking place in 1000 A.D.– 1500 A.D.
Issues with the mainstream Word History : there are no chronicles irrefutably proven to be older than 1400 A.D. Subjective methods of dating documents and/or artifacts used arbitrarily, the objective methods of dating evaded. The famous radiocarbon-14C dating method lost its precision due to numerous nuclear tests in 1945-1964 and doesn't stand the black box test (alleged age of sample to test has to be told first. Sic !). Radiocarbon-14C initial calibration was made on samples from 'ancient' Egypt, the age of samples was set arbitrarily. Astronomy contradicts consensual history. Ptolemy is reliably datable to XVI cy. All solar and lunar eclipses described in chronicles dated prior to XVIcy to stress the importance of events and people acting in them actually never took place in locations at moments of time therein indicated. 6000 years long Chinese History is even more bogus than European . It is high time for the mainstream historians to stop bickering and to re-start the world history as science. Don't not coin history pls.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful.
Presumably undecipherable lettering
By bonda
This kindle damages severely both geography and numismatics.
Maps and Coins vs History (History: Fiction or Science? Book 17), by Anatoly Fomenko, Gleb Nosovskiy PDF
Maps and Coins vs History (History: Fiction or Science? Book 17), by Anatoly Fomenko, Gleb Nosovskiy EPub
Maps and Coins vs History (History: Fiction or Science? Book 17), by Anatoly Fomenko, Gleb Nosovskiy Doc
Maps and Coins vs History (History: Fiction or Science? Book 17), by Anatoly Fomenko, Gleb Nosovskiy iBooks
Maps and Coins vs History (History: Fiction or Science? Book 17), by Anatoly Fomenko, Gleb Nosovskiy rtf
Maps and Coins vs History (History: Fiction or Science? Book 17), by Anatoly Fomenko, Gleb Nosovskiy Mobipocket
Maps and Coins vs History (History: Fiction or Science? Book 17), by Anatoly Fomenko, Gleb Nosovskiy Kindle
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar